RJA #10b: Reasons

1. The jury is not convicting because they don't believe the evidence is enough for them. -
   Andrew P. Thomas, The CSI Effect: Fact or Fiction, 115 Yale L.J. Pocket Part 70 (2006), http://www.thepocketpart.org/2006/02/thomas.html.
2. Juries believe what they see on tv and think they are experts. - Ramsland, Katherine. The C.S.I. Effect. New York: Berkley Boulevard Books, 2006. N. pag. Print.
3. Evidence should be a connect the dots and "leave the jury no choice but to convict". - Ramsland, Katherine. The C.S.I. Effect. New York: Berkley Boulevard Books, 2006. N. pag. Print.
4. An investigators involvement normally ends with collection of evidence but tv shows them doing the collection, tests, and investigation. -CSI tv shows and "Scene of the Crime." Inside Story. Host Bill Kurtis. A&E Network. 29 Dec. 1998. DVD-ROM.
5. Tv shows use certain techniques and programs that aren't used but there is some kind of variant of it that doesn't always work like in the shows. An example is the fingerprint system tv shows use that come up with a hit instantly but in reality there are multiple systems that are either local or federal and it takes days to get anything from them. -tv shows and forensic science classes